-----
--HomeFAQsJoinFeedbackLinks-
-

About Us
Officers
Journal
Events Calendar

Journal: June 2003 Issue 52

Copyright

W3C Patent Policy

by Laura Seeto , Freehills

"The World Wide Consortium (W3C), the international internet standards body, has approved the W3C Patent Policy (Patent Policy). The Patent Policy aims to reduce the threat of key components of Web infrastructure being the subject of patents which prevent further Web development, by ensuring that patented Web technologies are made available royalty-free."


Laura Seeto is a solicitor at Freehills, in the Telecommunications, Media & Technology Group.



The World Wide Consortium (W3C), the international internet standards body, has approved the W3C Patent Policy (Patent Policy). The Patent Policy aims to reduce the threat of key components of Web infrastructure being the subject of patents which prevent further Web development, by ensuring that patented Web technologies are made available royalty-free.

According to W3C, the success of the Web to date has largely resulted from the early decision by W3C Members involved in building the Web to base the Web on royalty-free standards, and the adoption of the Patent Policy is a continuation of this commitment.

The Patent Policy provides that:

  • all participants in Working Groups developing W3C Web standards (known as Recommendations) must agree to license essential claims, namely patents that block interoperability, on a royalty-free basis;

  • in some circumstances, Working Group participants may exclude specifically identified patent claims from the royalty-free commitment. This is conditional upon such exclusions being highlighted shortly after publication of the first public Working Draft of each Recommendation, to prevent difficulties arising from 'surprise' patents; and

  • W3C members are required to disclose patents that may be essential to the Recommendation, while other parties who have seen the technical drafts of the Recommendation and have actual knowledge of potentially essential patents are requested to make similar disclosures.

In addition, the Patent Policy stipulates that where technologies proposed for inclusion in Recommendations are not available with terms consistent with the Patent Policy, for example in cases where the patent holder wishes to charge a fee, a Patent Advisory Group (PAG) will be convened to address the particular patent claim. The PAG will be comprised of W3C Members participating in the Working Group and may recommend that the patent be legally analysed, instruct the Working Group to attempt to work around the patent or remove the patented technology, or may suggest ceasing all work in the area. If it is impossible to achieve consistency between the patent and the W3C licensing requirements, the PAG may recommend that an exception be made and the patented technology included in the Recommendation. If such a recommendation is made, the precise licensing terms must be publicly disclosed and are subject to review by the public, the W3C Membership and the W3C Director. According to W3C, this exception handling process was included in the Patent Policy to preserve a degree of flexibility for unexpected situations that may arise in Recommendation development.

Some concerns have been raised regarding the efficacy of the Patent Policy, for example see http://www.itweek.co.uk/News/1141179. More details about the Patent Policy can be found on the W3C website, http://www.w3.org/2001/ppwg/.



June 2003 contents



HomeFAQsJoinFeedbackLinks
HomeHome
Copyright © 2001, NSW Society for Computers and the Law, All rights reserved. Last Modified 28 Feb 2007.